Failed Branding: Labeling Mistakes That Led to Disaster

1. Tropicana’s Packaging Redesign: A Case of Lost Recognition

Tropicana made a bold move in 2009 by redesigning its orange juice packaging, replacing its iconic “orange with a straw” image with a minimalist, modern look. The idea was to refresh the brand, but instead, it left customers confused. Loyal shoppers failed to recognize the product on shelves without its familiar visual cues. The result? A 20% drop in sales within two months, costing the company $30 million in lost revenue before reverting to the original design.

What Went Wrong?

Removing Tropicana’s most recognizable brand element created immediate confusion among consumers. Customers who had long associated the bright orange packaging and straw image with fresh juice suddenly couldn’t find their favorite brand. The company also failed to conduct extensive market testing, assuming the cleaner design would resonate without issue.

This drastic change alienated loyal buyers, many of whom unknowingly bypassed Tropicana’s redesigned cartons in favor of competitors that retained familiar visual cues. Without the strong shelf presence the previous packaging had established, Tropicana lost a significant portion of its market share in a matter of weeks.

Lessons for Your Label Design

Brand consistency is crucial. When updating labels, gradual evolution is safer than an abrupt redesign. Conducting consumer research before launching a new look can help you understand potential reactions and avoid alienating your audience.

Maintaining key visual elements that customers associate with your brand ensures that recognition and trust remain intact. If a redesign is necessary, consider a phased rollout in which old and new packaging coexist for a period, giving consumers time to adapt to the change without losing familiarity.

This guide offers expert tips on redesigning labels to ensure you maintain your brand identity and avoid disaster.

Discover How

2. Crystal Pepsi: Failed Branding Due to Confused Consumers

In the early ’90s, Pepsi introduced Crystal Pepsi, a clear version of its famous cola, marketed as a “pure” and “healthier” alternative. However, the label design failed to communicate the product’s identity clearly. Without its familiar dark caramel color, consumers weren’t sure if it was a soda, flavored water, or something else entirely. Sales plummeted, and the product was discontinued within a year.

What Went Wrong?

Crystal Pepsi’s label design did not reinforce that it was still a cola, which confused customers who had come to associate soda with its classic brown hue. Without a strong marketing strategy or message to clarify the product’s identity, many consumers hesitated to try it. The failure to create strong brand messaging on the label ultimately led to a lack of confidence in the product.

Pepsi failed to provide clear visual or textual indicators that Crystal Pepsi was still a traditional cola, just without artificial coloring. This lack of clarity caused consumers to second-guess the product, leading to decreased interest and sales.

Lessons for Your Label Design

A product’s label must clearly communicate what it is and why consumers should buy it. Color choices and familiar branding elements are essential for brand identity. Relying solely on novelty without clear messaging can lead to consumer confusion and lack of trust.

Ensure that your product’s benefits and identity are easily understood at a glance. If launching an innovative product, use strong supporting text, imagery, or callouts to reinforce what differentiates it from competitors while still tying it to established consumer expectations.

Gain a clear understanding of how packaging and labeling impact consumer decision-making by checking out this insightful article.

Influence Consumers

3. New Coke: The Label Redesign That Sparked a Revolt

In 1985, Coca-Cola introduced New Coke, a reformulated version of its original soda featuring a modernized label. However, the company failed to account for consumers’ deep emotional attachment to the original product and branding. The public backlash was immediate, and within 79 days, Coca-Cola was forced to reintroduce “Coca-Cola Classic,” returning to the original formula and label. Ironically, the fiasco reinforced consumer loyalty to the original brand.

What Went Wrong?

Coca-Cola underestimated how much consumers valued the familiarity and tradition of its brand identity. While it sought to modernize its label and formula, it failed to recognize that customers weren’t looking for change. The lack of consumer input and testing before rolling out such a drastic shift led to a massive outcry. Coca-Cola assumed that a new formula with a contemporary look would be universally welcomed, but it failed to gauge the emotional response consumers would have to losing a product they had trusted for decades.

Lessons for Your Label Design

Brands must understand the emotional connection customers have with their visual identity. Introducing changes gradually or involving customers in the process can ease transitions. Removing or drastically altering a familiar label without warning can erode trust and drive loyal consumers to competitors. If considering a formula or packaging change, a limited release or test market approach can help brands gauge consumer sentiment before making irreversible changes.

4. Heinz EZ Squirt Ketchup: Fun for Kids, a Turnoff for Adults

In 2000, Heinz introduced EZ Squirt Ketchup in bright colors like green, blue, and purple. While children loved the playful designs, parents and adults found them unappetizing. The initial sales spike from novelty buyers quickly faded, and the product was discontinued by 2006.

What Went Wrong?

The label and brand strategy of Heinz EZ Squirt catered exclusively to children, ignoring the preferences of the primary buyers—parents. While fun for kids, the unfamiliar ketchup colors made the product feel unnatural. Over time, the novelty wore off, and sales declined rapidly. Heinz had not considered long-term consumer acceptance when launching the product. Parents, the ones making the purchasing decisions, ultimately rejected the product, and sales plummeted once the initial excitement of the advertising campaign waned.

Lessons for Your Label Design

Understanding who is making the purchasing decision is vital when designing product labels. Labels should be appealing to both the end-user and the actual buyer. While creativity is important, staying within consumer expectations for product appearance and function ensures long-term marketing campaign success. Brands should test radical logo redesign concepts with focus groups representing both the target user and the decision-maker to ensure long-term viability.

5. Gap’s Logo Redesign Disaster

In 2010, Gap decided to modernize its brand by replacing its classic blue-box logo with a plain Helvetica-styled version. The backlash was immediate and overwhelming. Within six days, Gap reverted to its original branding after spending an estimated $100 million on the failed redesign.

What Went Wrong?

The new logo and label design stripped away the identity that customers had associated with Gap for decades. It felt generic and uninspired, and customers did not see a reason for the change. The sudden shift without explanation or consumer consultation led to a strong negative reaction. Consumers perceived the change as unnecessary and disconnected from the brand’s heritage.

Lessons for Your Label Design

Drastic branding changes should always be tested and introduced gradually. Consumer research is critical to ensuring that changes are received positively. Labels and logos should maintain elements of brand heritage, even when updating to a modern look. Removing all visual ties to an established brand can create confusion and alienation. A slow transition, with customer involvement, is often a better approach to modernizing branding.

How to Test Your New Logos and Strategies to Avoid a Failed Branding Rollout

A well-planned brand update can refresh your image, attract new customers, and boost sales, but a misstep can be costly. Before launching a new logo or branding strategy, thorough label design testing is essential to ensure the update resonates with your target audience. Here are key strategies to validate your branding decisions and prevent failed branding mishaps:

Conduct Focus Groups: Gather feedback from existing and potential customers to gauge initial reactions to your new design. Ask specific questions about recognition, appeal, and clarity to uncover potential issues early.
A/B Testing on Packaging: Release two design variations in a small market test to determine which label performs better in sales and customer feedback.
Leverage Digital Mockups: Use augmented reality (AR) or online visualizers to show customers how the new branding will look in real-world applications.
Monitor Social Media Reactions: Share previews of your new design and analyze consumer responses before committing to full production.
Conduct Real-World Shelf Testing: Place different designs on shelves alongside competitors to see how they stand out in a retail environment.

Taking these steps helps ensure that your rebranding effort aligns with consumer expectations, maintains brand trust, and ultimately drives success instead of becoming a failed branding case study.

Avoid Failed Branding Efforts by Partnering With Accu-Label

Accu-Label has nearly four decades of expertise in creating branding solutions that connect with customers and stay true to your brand and customers’ perception of you. Our in-house design and printing services ensure durable, eye-catching labels that demand attention. Avoid costly failed branding—contact us today to develop a label strategy that enhances recognition, builds trust, and drives sales.

Failed Branding: 5 Historic Labeling Mistakes and Lessons Learned

1. Tropicana’s Packaging Redesign: A Case of Lost Recognition

What Went Wrong?

Lessons for Your Label Design

2. Crystal Pepsi: Failed Branding Due to Confused Consumers

What Went Wrong?

Lessons for Your Label Design

3. New Coke: The Label Redesign That Sparked a Revolt

What Went Wrong?

Lessons for Your Label Design

4. Heinz EZ Squirt Ketchup: Fun for Kids, a Turnoff for Adults

What Went Wrong?

Lessons for Your Label Design

5. Gap’s Logo Redesign Disaster

What Went Wrong?

Lessons for Your Label Design

How to Test Your New Logos and Strategies to Avoid a Failed Branding Rollout

Avoid Failed Branding Efforts by Partnering With Accu-Label

Share This Post

More Like This

What Label Buyers Need To Know About Prime vs. Secondary Labels

Label Design Testing: How to Measure the Effectiveness of Your Product Labels

How to Communicate and Add Value With Your Product’s Brand Label Design

Branding Products for Different Markets: Expert Packaging and Labeling Strategies

CMYK vs. RGB for Label Design: A Complete Guide

How Custom Foil Labels Elevate Product Appeal and Branding

How to Address and Ensure Label Quality for Your Products

Glossy, Satin, or Matte: Which Type of Label Finish Is Right for Your Product?

Label Redesign Tips for Maintaining Brand Consistency and Building Customer Trust

Stay Connected

Labeling Capabilities

Contact Us